(The following is the bulk of the toast that I gave to my parents at their recent 50th wedding anniversary celebration)
Fifty years is a long time. And it's a very long time for two people to be married. And it's an especially long time for two people with personalities like my parents....
For those who know my parents, you'll get a kick out of this. For those who never met them, please allow me to introduce them to you........
For the past 10-15 years, we have been getting together weekly for dinner at my parents house. It keeps us close as a family and gives us a chance to keep up on what's going on in each others lives. But dinner at the Wilson's can sometimes have it's moments.
For instance, ever since Caller-ID made it's debut at my parents house, phone calls are always an adventure. The phone will ring and my Dad will quickly head to the caller-ID box to see who's calling. The whole time he's trying to uncover the mystery caller, my Mom will be chiming in with, "Who is it, Ervin? Are You gonna answer it? That might be the call I was waiting for. Why don't you just pick it up?"
Of course, my dad, not being a man of great patience, fires back," It's says 'unknown', Linda. And I don't answer the phone is it's an unknown!"
As the phone continues to ring, my mom will remind him that she's waiting for an important phone call.
My dad, getting increasing aggravated, will say, "Damn it Linda, what part of unknown don't you understand? If I don't know who it is, I ain't answering it!"
Eventually, the answering machine will kick in and sure enough, it will turn out to be that important call that my mother was waiting for. Then, literally like clockwork, bird noises will begin to chirp out of the large collection of wall clocks my Dad has accumulated over the years. As he finally picks up the phone, he tries his best to answer it in spite of the three part harmony of cuckoo clocks in the background. My mom is relentless through the whole thing. As my dad tries to talk to the person on the other end of the line, my mom keeps hammering away by saying, "What is he saying, Ervin? Ask him about this? About him about that?"
Of course, my dad gets more and more frustrated until he finally takes the phone away from his ear and says, "Dammit Linda. I'm tryin' to talk over here!" He'll eventually hang up, seldom getting any of my mother's questions answered. This, of course, always leads to another round of bickering....
My mom might be in a wheelchair, but don't let that fool you. She can definitely hold her own. Some people might even say that she likes to be in control. Several years ago, around the holidays, she asked me to pick up a bottle of Egg Nog for her. There was one particular brand that she wanted, if I'm not mistaken it was Pennsylvania Dutch. Well anyway, after she told me several times, she insisted that I write it down on paper. So, I scribbled Pennsylvania Dutch Egg Nog on a piece of paper and headed off to the local Goldberg's liquor store. I walk into the store and just as I begin to scan the shelves, the phone at the front of the store rings. The cashier puts his hand over the receiver and yells to me, "Hey bud, is your name Ken?"
Trying to decide whether I should answer him or just crawl under one of the shelves, I finally reply, "Yep, that would be me."
He then says, "I've got your mother on the phone. She says to make sure you get her the Pennsylvania Dutch Egg Nog." Of course, as my luck would have it, the store was packed. But, in the end, mom got her special egg nog and she was happy.
I can remember another time when my mother sent my dad to the grocery store for a few things. One of the items happened to be pancake syrup. But not just any pancake syrup, it had to be Aunt Jemina. Well, after my dad gets home and starts to unload the grocery bags, my mom quickly discovers that he picked up some off-brand syrup. She lays into him about how she specifically asked for Aunt Jemina. She reminded him that she gave him a list and demanded to know why he deliberately disobeyed her request. Losing his patience, he finally said, "Linda, I ain't buy no Aunt Jemima pancake syrup!" My mother wasn't letting up and still demanded to know why. My dad finally reached his breaking point and said, "Because I didn't like the way the woman on the bottle was looking at me!" You gotta give it to him, he's original....
And another interesting thing about my dad, is that he's become Mr. Bargain Hunter when it comes to grocery shopping. He'll clip coupons out of the Sunday paper to prepare for his shopping day later in the week. Sometimes, depending on how the coupons work out, he'll stop at five different stores to get five different items. He likes to tell us about the great deals that he gets. On at least one occasion, he had so many coupons and discount points, after all his items were scanned, the store practically gave him money.
Many of you know that my dad worked as a carpenter for most of his adult life. Well, over the past couple of years he has put down his hammer and transitioned into the lawnmower king of the East Coast. He often spends his days scouring the earth looking for discarded and neglected lawn mowers that he will ultimately give a second chance at life. For anyone who's willing to listen, he will gladly tell you about his success stories. If you're really lucky, like I am sometimes, he'll start one of them up for you. I'll admit, I'm no lawnmower man, so all I hear is a loud gasoline engine. But to my dad, it's like listening to the Briggs and Stratton symphony orchestra. I'm not saying that he's obsessed with lawn mowers, but even if you happen to be talking about politics, religion or a football game, the conversation always seems to end up with my dad giving you an education on how to clean a dirty carburetor or how to sharpen a mulching blade.
And speaking of football, when my dad has a little downtime from his lawnmower empire, he likes to spend time watching his favorite football team, the Baltimore Ravens. He always gets especially excited when his favorite player, Ray Lewis makes a big play..........Of course, I'm kidding. My dad is no fan of the Ravens. A word of warning .....If you ever say, "How about those Ravens!" around him, expect to get an earful. If you really push the issue, he'll resort to his coffee can full of anti-Raven's newspaper clippings.
....................................................................................................................................
There are plenty of other funny stories, but on a serious note, my parents are both truly wonderful people. Although my mother may have been set back by Multiple Sclerosis, she never let it break her spirit. She continues to live everyday to the fullest with one of the best attitudes that I've ever seen. And even when she's in serious pain and discomfort, I have never once heard her complain. She might be limited physically, but she makes up for it with mental toughness. She's the strongest person I've ever known.
As for my dad, he can sometimes come off as being a no-nonsense, old-school tough guy, but in reality he has a heart of gold. Whether I need a helping hand or just some good advice, he's always there. He's a good man and he taught me a lot through the years.
So, with that I'd like everyone to raise their glasses and let's toast Linda and Erv. May they have another fifty years together!
kw
Monday, May 28, 2012
Monday, May 14, 2012
Facebook - To Buy or Not To Buy
I have been out of the stock game for quite a few years. But all of the attention that is being generated by Facebook's initial public offering this Friday really has my thinking. Do I blow the dust off of my E-Trade account and get in on what could be a huge money-making opportunity? Or do I listen to my conservative conscience and just sit back and watch the story unfold on Friday with nothing at stake?
I have seen other IPO's start off at the predetermined price only to skyrocket in the first few hours of trading. The problem is that you can't always get in at the predetermined price. If the stock starts at $30 a share, by the time your market order gets filled, it could be double that price. That's what scares me. If I choose to buy stock in Facebook, I will certainly use a limit order to protect myself from this scenario. Of course, the downside is missing the buy-in completely and watching the profit train leave the station without you. From what I understand, the initial stock price of $28-35 will be increased to the $35-40 range in the next day or so. By Friday could we be looking at $50+?
I can't help but wonder if this would be a wise investment in the first place. To make money, Facebook relies on advertisement revenue. In 2009, the company's revenue was $777 million. Last year, it grew to a whopping 3.7 billion. But here's where I get confused.....I know a lot of people who use Facebook but I can't think of even one them that has ever bought an advertised product from the social media website. And with the company now having to answer to Wall Street, there will certainly be much more pressure to increase the revenue stream. Is this a realistic expectation? I think we're about to find out......
CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is only twenty-eight years old. After this Friday's IPO, he could be the owner of a $100 billion dollar company. This would make Facebook more valuable than iconic American companies like Disney and Ford. Although the numbers certainly add up, I still have a hard time comprehending it.
Most of the employees currently hold restricted stock units (RSU's) that liquidate and become actual stock shares when the company goes public. In other words, most of Facebook's employees will become instant millionaires on Friday. Imagine what that's going to do for company morale!
The estimated cumulative tax bill from the employee's new found wealth will be around $4 billion. Fortunately for cash-starved California, it will also see around $1.5 billion of those taxes. And I'm no fan of the tax man, but the bottom line is....If you're paying him big bucks, it probably means that you're making big bucks.
Even if I do get in on the IPO this Friday, I probably won't invest too much. I'm still gun-shy over what happened to the stock market ten years ago. And this low-risk mindset is probably why I'll never become filthy rich. But on the bright side, I won't have to write Uncle Sam a check for a million bucks.....
kw
I have seen other IPO's start off at the predetermined price only to skyrocket in the first few hours of trading. The problem is that you can't always get in at the predetermined price. If the stock starts at $30 a share, by the time your market order gets filled, it could be double that price. That's what scares me. If I choose to buy stock in Facebook, I will certainly use a limit order to protect myself from this scenario. Of course, the downside is missing the buy-in completely and watching the profit train leave the station without you. From what I understand, the initial stock price of $28-35 will be increased to the $35-40 range in the next day or so. By Friday could we be looking at $50+?
I can't help but wonder if this would be a wise investment in the first place. To make money, Facebook relies on advertisement revenue. In 2009, the company's revenue was $777 million. Last year, it grew to a whopping 3.7 billion. But here's where I get confused.....I know a lot of people who use Facebook but I can't think of even one them that has ever bought an advertised product from the social media website. And with the company now having to answer to Wall Street, there will certainly be much more pressure to increase the revenue stream. Is this a realistic expectation? I think we're about to find out......
CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, is only twenty-eight years old. After this Friday's IPO, he could be the owner of a $100 billion dollar company. This would make Facebook more valuable than iconic American companies like Disney and Ford. Although the numbers certainly add up, I still have a hard time comprehending it.
Most of the employees currently hold restricted stock units (RSU's) that liquidate and become actual stock shares when the company goes public. In other words, most of Facebook's employees will become instant millionaires on Friday. Imagine what that's going to do for company morale!
The estimated cumulative tax bill from the employee's new found wealth will be around $4 billion. Fortunately for cash-starved California, it will also see around $1.5 billion of those taxes. And I'm no fan of the tax man, but the bottom line is....If you're paying him big bucks, it probably means that you're making big bucks.
Even if I do get in on the IPO this Friday, I probably won't invest too much. I'm still gun-shy over what happened to the stock market ten years ago. And this low-risk mindset is probably why I'll never become filthy rich. But on the bright side, I won't have to write Uncle Sam a check for a million bucks.....
kw
Friday, May 11, 2012
Attachment Parenting - Beyond The Magazine Cover
The latest cover of Time magazine is certainly drawing a lot of attention. But the story behind the cover photo is much more intriguing. "Attachment parenting" is the topic that is really being addressed here. Essentially, attachment parenting (a phrase coined by pediatrician William Sears) is based on the "attachment theory" in which a child forms a strong emotional bond with a caregiver(s) during childhood and carries it forward into adulthood.
Some of the principles of attachment parenting* include:
Some of the principles of attachment parenting* include:
- Feed your child (ideally via breastfeeding) with love and respect
- Respond to the child with sensitivity. In other words, try to understand why your child is throwing a temper tantrum instead of resorting to punishment
- Use nurturing touch. Examples of this would be joint baths or "baby-wearing" in which you carry your child around all day in a front-facing sling
- Practice positive discipline. If a child acts out with negative behavior, the parent should try to understand what the child is trying to "communicate". Parents are encouraged to work out a solution with the child rather than punishment such as spanking
All right, I can't take any more of this! Is it any wonder why so many of today's kids are undisciplined, disrespectful and lack ambition? Is providing a constant security blanket really going to prepare the child for the real world? This isn't France, this is America for God's sake! What are we doing to our kids??
I'm certainly no doctor or philosopher but I did participate in raising a successful, self-sufficient child. So, that should give me at least a little credibility. With that being said, here are what I feel are some of the correct principles in raising a child. I'll refer to them as "Real-World Principles for Successful Child Development":
- Encourage your child to excel, but don't be afraid to let them fail. When the child achieves success, let them know that it is recognized and appreciated. When failure happens, look at it as a golden teaching opportunity. In life, there are times you will stumble and fall. It's how many times you get back up that really matters. Acknowledge your child's progress to build self-esteem.
- A child must respect the parent. If it takes an occasional smack on the ass to gain that respect, so be it.
- When possible, let your kids work out their own problems, letting them know that you will be there for guidance and support. This will help teach them responsibility.
- Teach your kids to respect others and to be compassionate to those who might not be as fortunate
- Encourage your child to meet new friends. This will help develop social and interpersonal skills that will benefit him/her later in life. Getting them involved in team sports and other activities at a young age is a great start.
- Teach your kids to stand up for themselves. Although there's a "zero-tolerance" rule in most of today's schools, let your child know that he/she doesn't have to take any crap from others (specifically bullies). If a kid gets suspended for defending himself, I have an issue with the school system, not the child.
- Try to eat dinner together as a family. As simple as this sounds, it's a great way to keep an open dialogue with your kids.
- As they reach their teenage years, let them begin to "pull their own weight". If they want something bad enough, let them earn it. This will teach them the value of a dollar as well as independence. In the real world, every day is not Christmas. Don't condition your child to think that it is.
- When moral lines are crossed, encourage your child to own up to it and take the necessary steps to make things right. This builds character and integrity.
- Enforce your rules. If the child breaks a rule, there must be consequences. This will teach accountability.
I'm sure I left a few out. But in a nutshell, I believe in the old school method of raising kids and I don't agree with the practice of pampering kids. Maybe you agree with me or maybe you think that I'm clueless. But it's a tough world out there, and I think we owe it to our kids to make sure they're prepared for it. Carrying them around in a "front-facing sling" until they're teenagers sure doesn't sound like a good plan to me.....
kw
Thursday, May 10, 2012
The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage
It looks like the issue of gay marriage is shaping up to be a hot item in this year's election. This week President Obama shifted his from his 2008 campaign position and now supports gay marriage. I can't help but think that Vice President Biden's comments on Meet The Press over the weekend had something to do with Obama's sudden change. Biden basically said that he was "absolutely comfortable" with gay marriage which inevitably forced a response from the President. Obama is the first President in history to publicly support same-sex marriage.
Most Republicans argue that traditional marriage should be between a man and woman. Religious views, no doubt, weigh heavily on the right-wing perspective. However, in an attempt to compromise, many conservatives have said that civil unions between same-sex couples would be something that they would support. At the very least, most Americans seem to be open to supporting survivor rights for gay couples.
Democrats, on the other hand, are somewhat split on the issue. While many of them believe that the traditional marriage of man and women should be left in tact, others believe that marriage is a basic civil right. As a whole, our country seems to be split right down the middle on the issue.
On Tuesday, North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. My understanding is that black voters favored the amendment two to one. This makes Obama's support of gay marriage even more risky as he got an overwhelming majority of the black vote in 2008. On a talk radio program today, I heard that roughly twenty percent of Obama's "campaign bundlers" happened to be gay. These also happen to be the folks who raise the big money for the campaign. So, I can't help but wonder if money motivated the President's recent comments.
In my home state of Maryland, Governor O'Malley recently signed a bill into law that permits gay couples to marry. O'Malley, who happens to be Catholic, was urged by the Archbishop of Baltimore to oppose the bill. But in a battle of politics and religion, the winner in this case was politics. Many Maryland residents feel that O'Malley is setting the stage for his future presidential run. Nonetheless, the new law has drawn a fair amount of opposition and will likely go to a referendum in the fall election.
Complicating the matter to a degree is the Defense of Marriage Act (aka DOMA) which is a federal law that defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. This bill passed both houses of Congress by large majorities in 1996. And although typically viewed as a liberal, President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law. But nonetheless, many people believe that gay marriage is something that individual states should decide.
As things heat up in the campaign season, this will undoubtedly be a contentious issue. While Obama now says he supports gay marriage, Mitt Romney continues to voice his opposition on it. The number of votes that are up for grabs is anyone's guess. Depending on the source, it's estimated that there are between four and nine million homosexuals in the United States. Perhaps not a huge voting bloc in itself, there are still plenty people who feel strongly enough about same-sex marriage (one way or the other) to let it influence who gets their vote in the November. Assuming that this will be a close election, paraphrasing Joe Biden, this is a big f*cking deal.
Currently, six states, as well as Washington DC, issue licenses to same-sex couples: Massachusetts (ironically where Mitt Romney was Governor), Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and New York. Although Maryland and Washington have recently passed laws allowing same-sex marriage, they will likely wind up on the ballot for public vote in November.
Will state's move progressively to accept same-sex marriage? Or can we expect to see growing opposition as it makes it's way around to various states? No matter where you stand on this, I think it's safe to say that it's not going away anytime soon........
kw
Most Republicans argue that traditional marriage should be between a man and woman. Religious views, no doubt, weigh heavily on the right-wing perspective. However, in an attempt to compromise, many conservatives have said that civil unions between same-sex couples would be something that they would support. At the very least, most Americans seem to be open to supporting survivor rights for gay couples.
Democrats, on the other hand, are somewhat split on the issue. While many of them believe that the traditional marriage of man and women should be left in tact, others believe that marriage is a basic civil right. As a whole, our country seems to be split right down the middle on the issue.
On Tuesday, North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. My understanding is that black voters favored the amendment two to one. This makes Obama's support of gay marriage even more risky as he got an overwhelming majority of the black vote in 2008. On a talk radio program today, I heard that roughly twenty percent of Obama's "campaign bundlers" happened to be gay. These also happen to be the folks who raise the big money for the campaign. So, I can't help but wonder if money motivated the President's recent comments.
In my home state of Maryland, Governor O'Malley recently signed a bill into law that permits gay couples to marry. O'Malley, who happens to be Catholic, was urged by the Archbishop of Baltimore to oppose the bill. But in a battle of politics and religion, the winner in this case was politics. Many Maryland residents feel that O'Malley is setting the stage for his future presidential run. Nonetheless, the new law has drawn a fair amount of opposition and will likely go to a referendum in the fall election.
Complicating the matter to a degree is the Defense of Marriage Act (aka DOMA) which is a federal law that defines marriage as the legal union between one man and one woman. This bill passed both houses of Congress by large majorities in 1996. And although typically viewed as a liberal, President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law. But nonetheless, many people believe that gay marriage is something that individual states should decide.
As things heat up in the campaign season, this will undoubtedly be a contentious issue. While Obama now says he supports gay marriage, Mitt Romney continues to voice his opposition on it. The number of votes that are up for grabs is anyone's guess. Depending on the source, it's estimated that there are between four and nine million homosexuals in the United States. Perhaps not a huge voting bloc in itself, there are still plenty people who feel strongly enough about same-sex marriage (one way or the other) to let it influence who gets their vote in the November. Assuming that this will be a close election, paraphrasing Joe Biden, this is a big f*cking deal.
Currently, six states, as well as Washington DC, issue licenses to same-sex couples: Massachusetts (ironically where Mitt Romney was Governor), Iowa, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire and New York. Although Maryland and Washington have recently passed laws allowing same-sex marriage, they will likely wind up on the ballot for public vote in November.
Will state's move progressively to accept same-sex marriage? Or can we expect to see growing opposition as it makes it's way around to various states? No matter where you stand on this, I think it's safe to say that it's not going away anytime soon........
kw
Saturday, May 5, 2012
An Extra Crispy Woman
The past week a New Jersey woman was arrested for taking her 5 year-old daughter in to a tanning booth with her. State law prohibits anyone the age fourteen to enter an artificial tanning facility. It seems to be make sense to me.
I initially figured the New Jersey woman was just a bonehead who was trying to save money on a babysitter. But when I saw an interview with her on one of the news stations, I nearly spit out out a mouthful of Landshark. The woman's skin looked like an over-grilled hot dog! When I first saw her, I thought she was Al Jolson. As she spoke to the TV reporter, I had an uneasy feeling that her crispy face could crack at any moment. It was actually hard to watch and as a result, I'll never look at a piece of beef jerky the same way.
I have to wonder what the woman's defense will be for taking her daughter into the tanning booth. Perhaps she'll claim that she had a momentary lapse of reason? Her face might look like something from a KFC menu, but I have to imagine that her brain is more like a hard boiled egg.
This makes me wonder why some people are so obsessed with tanning. Where in live in Maryland, I've seen people with full tans in the middle of winter. To me, it just looks completely out of place. Sporting a Banana Boat tan in July is one thing, but when you're shoveling snow in January it just looks silly. In some cases, obsessive tanners resemble giant carrots as their skin resonates a distinctive orange glow.
I think a twenty-something woman looks great with a nice tan. But some middle aged women actually look worse as the tan highlights their sun-damaged leathery skin. I was in Walmart recently and saw a woman who appeared to be in her mid-50's. She had an artificial tan which sharply contrasted with her bleach-blond hair. To make sure that there was no doubt that she had a whole body tan, she wore denim shorts and white midriff-baring shirt. I could tell that the woman thought she was hot, but in reality, she looked quite nasty.
I have never personally been in a tanning booth. I always thought of them as a giant microwave. Plus, once summer rolls around, I'll get more than my share of sun while I'm bonding with Captain Morgan by the pool. And honestly, I'm too just too cheap to resort to a tanning bed. Why should I pay for a tan when I can walk outside and get one for free?
kw
I initially figured the New Jersey woman was just a bonehead who was trying to save money on a babysitter. But when I saw an interview with her on one of the news stations, I nearly spit out out a mouthful of Landshark. The woman's skin looked like an over-grilled hot dog! When I first saw her, I thought she was Al Jolson. As she spoke to the TV reporter, I had an uneasy feeling that her crispy face could crack at any moment. It was actually hard to watch and as a result, I'll never look at a piece of beef jerky the same way.
I have to wonder what the woman's defense will be for taking her daughter into the tanning booth. Perhaps she'll claim that she had a momentary lapse of reason? Her face might look like something from a KFC menu, but I have to imagine that her brain is more like a hard boiled egg.
This makes me wonder why some people are so obsessed with tanning. Where in live in Maryland, I've seen people with full tans in the middle of winter. To me, it just looks completely out of place. Sporting a Banana Boat tan in July is one thing, but when you're shoveling snow in January it just looks silly. In some cases, obsessive tanners resemble giant carrots as their skin resonates a distinctive orange glow.
I think a twenty-something woman looks great with a nice tan. But some middle aged women actually look worse as the tan highlights their sun-damaged leathery skin. I was in Walmart recently and saw a woman who appeared to be in her mid-50's. She had an artificial tan which sharply contrasted with her bleach-blond hair. To make sure that there was no doubt that she had a whole body tan, she wore denim shorts and white midriff-baring shirt. I could tell that the woman thought she was hot, but in reality, she looked quite nasty.
I have never personally been in a tanning booth. I always thought of them as a giant microwave. Plus, once summer rolls around, I'll get more than my share of sun while I'm bonding with Captain Morgan by the pool. And honestly, I'm too just too cheap to resort to a tanning bed. Why should I pay for a tan when I can walk outside and get one for free?
kw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)